Home  /  Platform

The EQAS platform

Everything a cycle needs,
in one system

Enrolment, sample scheduling, result submission, statistical analysis and reporting run in a single application. No spreadsheets moving by email, no figures transcribed by hand between your submission and your report.

Capabilities

What the system does

Built around how a proficiency-testing cycle actually runs, rather than around a generic reporting tool.

Comprehensive quality checks

Every submitted result is screened on entry for units, expected range and decimal precision, so a transposed value is caught at the bench rather than surfacing as an outlier six weeks later.

Flexible packages and programmes

Schemes, analyte panels and pricing are configurable, so a laboratory enrols only in what it actually reports — and new schemes open without rebuilding anything.

Real-time result comparison

Once a cycle closes, your value appears against the peer consensus immediately, instead of waiting for a posted printout at the end of the year.

Automated calculations

Consensus mean, SD, CV, bias percentage and Z-score are computed per analyte the moment a cycle closes. Nothing is calculated by hand, so nothing carries a transcription error.

Unimodal and multimodal evaluation

Schemes assessed against a single consensus and those evaluated across several method groups run through the same pipeline, with no separate workflow to learn.

Qualitative analytes

Results reported as positive/negative or as a titre are scored on agreement with the consensus, rather than forced into a numeric deviation that would mean nothing.

Outlier summary and histograms

Every analyte plots as a distribution with your position marked, so a deviation is something you can see rather than something buried in a column of figures.

Integrated reporting

Submission, analysis, report generation and certification are stages of one process, so a report is never waiting on a file being moved between systems.

Minimal support requirement

Result entry takes a few minutes a month and needs no training beyond a first walkthrough. The portal is designed for a technologist between batches, not for an administrator.

What it means for your lab

Why the system matters to a participant

  • Easy configuration, plain interface

    Submit results, pull a report and download a certificate without a manual. Settings adapt to how your laboratory reports — your units, your decimal places, your analyte list.

  • Flexibility and custom fit

    Select only the schemes relevant to your scope. A collection centre running a core profile and a medical college running the full panel use the same system at different sizes.

  • Operational efficiency

    Automated analysis and reporting remove the manual effort that used to sit between a closing date and a usable report, which is why turnaround is measured in days.

  • Credibility you can evidence

    Consistent, peer-referenced performance is a concrete thing to put in front of an assessor, a referring hospital or a corporate client who asks how you assure quality.

  • Improvement over time

    Trend analysis and deviation tracking across cycles show whether an issue is noise or the early edge of drift, so corrective action is scheduled on evidence rather than on the calendar.

  • Support after enrolment

    A coordinator you can reach about scope coverage, an unusual method declaration or a problem with this month's submission — not a ticket queue.

How the numbers are produced

Peer grouping is what makes the comparison fair

Creatinine measured enzymatically and creatinine measured by Jaffe do not share a consensus. Scoring one against the other produces a bias that says nothing about your laboratory — and could send a quality manager to recalibrate a perfectly accurate analyser.

So the method and instrument you declare at enrolment is load-bearing data. The analysis partitions participants by that declaration, trims outliers before establishing consensus, and calculates your statistics against your own group.

Where a peer group is too small to be meaningful, your result is assessed against the all-method group — and the report says so. You can then weigh the bias correctly rather than chase a deviation that is an artefact of the comparison itself.

See the seven reports

Enrolment for the 2026 cycle is open

Register a new laboratory or renew an existing participation. Already enrolled? Sign in to submit this month's results.

Register / renew Sign in