Comprehensive quality checks
Every submitted result is screened on entry for units, expected range and decimal precision, so a transposed value is caught at the bench rather than surfacing as an outlier six weeks later.
Home / Platform
The EQAS platformEnrolment, sample scheduling, result submission, statistical analysis and reporting run in a single application. No spreadsheets moving by email, no figures transcribed by hand between your submission and your report.
Built around how a proficiency-testing cycle actually runs, rather than around a generic reporting tool.
Every submitted result is screened on entry for units, expected range and decimal precision, so a transposed value is caught at the bench rather than surfacing as an outlier six weeks later.
Schemes, analyte panels and pricing are configurable, so a laboratory enrols only in what it actually reports — and new schemes open without rebuilding anything.
Once a cycle closes, your value appears against the peer consensus immediately, instead of waiting for a posted printout at the end of the year.
Consensus mean, SD, CV, bias percentage and Z-score are computed per analyte the moment a cycle closes. Nothing is calculated by hand, so nothing carries a transcription error.
Schemes assessed against a single consensus and those evaluated across several method groups run through the same pipeline, with no separate workflow to learn.
Results reported as positive/negative or as a titre are scored on agreement with the consensus, rather than forced into a numeric deviation that would mean nothing.
Every analyte plots as a distribution with your position marked, so a deviation is something you can see rather than something buried in a column of figures.
Submission, analysis, report generation and certification are stages of one process, so a report is never waiting on a file being moved between systems.
Result entry takes a few minutes a month and needs no training beyond a first walkthrough. The portal is designed for a technologist between batches, not for an administrator.
Submit results, pull a report and download a certificate without a manual. Settings adapt to how your laboratory reports — your units, your decimal places, your analyte list.
Select only the schemes relevant to your scope. A collection centre running a core profile and a medical college running the full panel use the same system at different sizes.
Automated analysis and reporting remove the manual effort that used to sit between a closing date and a usable report, which is why turnaround is measured in days.
Consistent, peer-referenced performance is a concrete thing to put in front of an assessor, a referring hospital or a corporate client who asks how you assure quality.
Trend analysis and deviation tracking across cycles show whether an issue is noise or the early edge of drift, so corrective action is scheduled on evidence rather than on the calendar.
A coordinator you can reach about scope coverage, an unusual method declaration or a problem with this month's submission — not a ticket queue.
Creatinine measured enzymatically and creatinine measured by Jaffe do not share a consensus. Scoring one against the other produces a bias that says nothing about your laboratory — and could send a quality manager to recalibrate a perfectly accurate analyser.
So the method and instrument you declare at enrolment is load-bearing data. The analysis partitions participants by that declaration, trims outliers before establishing consensus, and calculates your statistics against your own group.
Where a peer group is too small to be meaningful, your result is assessed against the all-method group — and the report says so. You can then weigh the bias correctly rather than chase a deviation that is an artefact of the comparison itself.
Register a new laboratory or renew an existing participation. Already enrolled? Sign in to submit this month's results.